ATP Tour

[Kajzer10]

Sta se desava u Londonu? Jel Nishikori sa druge strane terena ili cunj kakav? 9-0

[COYS]

Cika Roger preslusa Thiema za cas posla

[Kajzer10]

Ko ovdje prolazi ako Federer uzme Andersona a Nishikori Thiema? Sta se gleda?

[AA23]

Ko ovdje prolazi ako Federer uzme Andersona a Nishikori Thiema? Sta se gleda?

Setovi onda, imali bi svi po 2 pobjede i 1 poraz.


Nishikori je u minusu jer je uzeo samo 1 gem protiv Andersona, a Federer i Anderson su u boljem balansu tu, tako da otprilike ide ovako.

Ako Thiem uzme Nishikorija, Federer i Anderson idu dalje, uz to da Roger uzme set Andersonu ili čak i da ne uzme ima bolji balans u odnosu na Nishikorija i Thiema.

Tada bi Fed, Nishi i Thiem imali 1-2 i gledao bi se bilans u osvojenim setovima ili gemovima, a opet Federer je tu prvi jer ima 10 gemova protiv Nishikorija osvojenih, 12 protiv Thiema, a Nishikori 13 protiv Federera, a 1 protiv Andersona.

Federer 22 > 14 Nishikori

Sa obzirom da se još nisu igrali mečevi Nishi-Thiem, a niti Federer - Anderson.


Ako Nishikori uzme Thiema, a Anderson Rogera, onda su Anderson i Nishikori prolaznici grupe.

[ronaldo99]

Jbt kao 8 najbolji na svijetu evo ovo je 7 meci na turniru i jos niti jedan mec nije bio kvalitetan, steta sto nema Borne i Khacanova koji bi igrali puno bolje od Zvereva, Theima, ovaj Zverev jesete jos uvijek mlad 21 god ali brate frajer nestane sa terena.

Nego zna li neko zasto Novak na kraju na kameri uvijek napise jucerasnji datum?

[lucky13]

Benneteau questions Federer's privileges

The former French player questioned some of the advantages that the Basel champion would have enjoyed.

But "Bennet'" has also taken advantage of its new status to denounce certain shortcomings in which, according to him, the governing bodies of tennis are getting lost. Especially when it comes to pampering its biggest star, Roger Federer. Benneteau gave his opinion on the privileges that would have been granted to the Baloise for years.

"Roger is a legend of the game, an icon, only he can bring 15,000 people to Bercy, nothing to say," began the Frenchman. Now, when he sets up the Laver Cup, there are a number of conflicts of interest that become disturbing. Regarding the new Davis Cup, he said nothing about the date in November. And when the September date was mentioned, he woke up and opposed Piqué (editor's note: the footballer at the head of Kosmos, the group that finances the new Davis Cup formula). That's where I find the instances of tennis are incredibly weak. His thing is an exhibition. There are no sporting selection criteria. He gives $750,000 to Nick Kyrgios. Yes, it's the rates. Another thing: in the organization of this event, there is Craig Tiley, the boss of the Australian Open, who is in charge of marketing and TV rights. Somewhere along the way, this gentleman is paid by Roger Federer's agent (editor's note: Tony Godsick) and behind him, as if by chance, Federer played 12 of his 14 matches in Melbourne at 7:30 pm."

Consequences of a slip-up at Wimbledon

And Benneteau recalled that Federer had avoided playing in the midst of the Australian heat wave, unlike other stars on the circuit, Novak Djokovic in the lead. The Serb, who had fought Gaël Monfils under a temperature of 42 degrees, would have rightly lost behind the scenes against the officials in charge of the tournament's schedule.

On the other hand, at the last Wimbledon tournament, the eight-time winner on the London turf felt penalized for being moved to court No. 1, where he had not played for three years, for his quarter-final defeat against Kevin Anderson. This would have prompted his entourage to react during the following Grand Slam tournament: "This year, the US Open opened the new Louis Armstrong court," said Benneteau. I heard Tony Godsick went into the referee's office to basically say, "No way you're scheduling him on this." Roger Federer had indeed played all his matches in the Arthur Ashe stadium. "It's normal that he has privileges, but there's a small drift," says the Tricolor. Now, we have to realize that there will be a void when he stops," concluded the former Bourg-en-Bresse player.

[bombaysaphire]

Američki teniser Džon Izner stao je u odbranu Rodžera Federera, koga je Francuz Žilijen Beneto optužio da kontroliše muški tenis.

Najbolji igrači pomažu u prodaji većine ulaznica jer gledaoci treba da dobiju najviše," rekao je Izner i nastavio:
Federer je simbol muškog tenisa.Najbolji igrači pomažu u prodaji većine ulaznica jer gledaoci treba da dobiju najviše," rekao je Izner i nastavio :
Favorizovani igrači? Ti momci ozbiljno promovišu naš sport. Zahvaljujući vrhunskim igračima drugi teniseri mogu da zarade više novca. Slična situacija je sa Tajgerom Vudsom u golfu. Federer zaslužuje više nego bilo ko drugi."


Srpski teniser Novak Đoković rekao je da Rodžer Federer zbog svega što je uradio za tenis zaslužuje da ima specijalan tretman.

To jeste tema za debatu jer na neki način on zaslužuje specijalan tretman jer je šestostruki šampion Australijan Opena i verovatno najbolji teniser u istoriji. Ako ga on nema, ko će ga imati? Ljudi žele da vide njega na centralnom terenu, u udarnom terminu, a to je u 19.30 na ‚Rod Lejver areni‘“, naglasio je Đoković.

Najbolji teniser sveta istakao je da je Beneto takođe imao koristi zbog svega što je Federer postigao.

„Ne vidim argumente. Razumem Žilijenovo viđenje jer ponekad stvarno izgleda da je neko favorizovan iz godine u godinu na određenim turnirima. Morate da pratite obrazac da biste istinski razumeli da li je takav slučaj ili ne. S druge strane, morate da shvatite da je Federer vodeća sila u tenisu što se tiče nagradnog fonda, pažnje i drugih stvari. Žilijen i teniseri kao što je on takođe imaju koristi od tenisa zahvaljujući Rodžeru i onome što je uradio za sport“, rekao je srpski teniser.

[delinjo]

Benneteau questions Federer's privileges

The former French player questioned some of the advantages that the Basel champion would have enjoyed.

But "Bennet'" has also taken advantage of its new status to denounce certain shortcomings in which, according to him, the governing bodies of tennis are getting lost. Especially when it comes to pampering its biggest star, Roger Federer. Benneteau gave his opinion on the privileges that would have been granted to the Baloise for years.

"Roger is a legend of the game, an icon, only he can bring 15,000 people to Bercy, nothing to say," began the Frenchman. Now, when he sets up the Laver Cup, there are a number of conflicts of interest that become disturbing. Regarding the new Davis Cup, he said nothing about the date in November. And when the September date was mentioned, he woke up and opposed Piqué (editor's note: the footballer at the head of Kosmos, the group that finances the new Davis Cup formula). That's where I find the instances of tennis are incredibly weak. His thing is an exhibition. There are no sporting selection criteria. He gives $750,000 to Nick Kyrgios. Yes, it's the rates. Another thing: in the organization of this event, there is Craig Tiley, the boss of the Australian Open, who is in charge of marketing and TV rights. Somewhere along the way, this gentleman is paid by Roger Federer's agent (editor's note: Tony Godsick) and behind him, as if by chance, Federer played 12 of his 14 matches in Melbourne at 7:30 pm."

Consequences of a slip-up at Wimbledon

And Benneteau recalled that Federer had avoided playing in the midst of the Australian heat wave, unlike other stars on the circuit, Novak Djokovic in the lead. The Serb, who had fought Gaël Monfils under a temperature of 42 degrees, would have rightly lost behind the scenes against the officials in charge of the tournament's schedule.

On the other hand, at the last Wimbledon tournament, the eight-time winner on the London turf felt penalized for being moved to court No. 1, where he had not played for three years, for his quarter-final defeat against Kevin Anderson. This would have prompted his entourage to react during the following Grand Slam tournament: "This year, the US Open opened the new Louis Armstrong court," said Benneteau. I heard Tony Godsick went into the referee's office to basically say, "No way you're scheduling him on this." Roger Federer had indeed played all his matches in the Arthur Ashe stadium. "It's normal that he has privileges, but there's a small drift," says the Tricolor. Now, we have to realize that there will be a void when he stops," concluded the former Bourg-en-Bresse player.

jel ovo Novak rece da je babuka najveci u historiji ili mi se ucinilo...sta na to kazu njegovi navijaci ?

[bombaysaphire]

Ovo je odgovor Novakog navijača.

[delinjo]

Ovo je odgovor Novakog navijača.

[ronaldo99]

Jeste rekao, bas sam mislio postaviti taj njegov press poslije prvog meca protiv Isnera gdje su ga pitali to za Rogera i gdje je Novak potpuno stao na stranu Rogera i rekao pa morate shvatiti da je on vjerovatno najbolji teniser ikad .

[Oikamid]

Pa šta očekujete da kaže?

[babino]

jel ovo znaci da fedja moze fasovati i pristojnih 2-0 a da ce proci?
a bilo kakva pobjeda ga vodi sa 1. mjesta?

[VGS]

Kakav jad od tenisa, Nishikori je hladno trebao opet gem uzeti za cijeli mec.

[delinjo]

Pa šta očekujete da kaže?

pa recimo ono da pocne lako je Rogeru bilo mlatiti Samprasa I Nalbandiana ...kako su mu sve zivo poklonili namjestili i kako je lako sa 38 godina igrati vrhunski tenis...eto takvo nesto odprilike

[japa]

Navijaci Federera: Andy Roddick je jedan od najvecih ikada!

[lucky13]

toliko favorizovanje jednog tenisera nikada nije u redu. pa i nole i rafa su vrhunski pa ni izdaleka nemaju takav tretman. pogotovo nole. pa njemu se namjerno otezava sa terminima itd. kada neko sam bira podloge, termine, da li ce se igrati sa ili bez krova itd... to je onda ogromna prednost nad ostalim igracima i to nikako nije fer. nole je rekao korektno ali je istovremeno uvjek osudjivan u medijim i nazivan svakako kada bi on ili neko mu blizak rekao da on zasluzuje bolji tretman. koji je nasprem rogerovog kao da se radi o pocetniku. a tolika razlika izmedju njih nije.razlika je do medijskog napuhavanja jednog. u igri nikako.

i jedno je najveci a drugo je najbolji. to smo vec diskutovali. nole je najbolji jer je igrao i igra najbolji tenis a rodja najveci jer je najtrofejniji.

[japa]

Fedferer je uvijek bio miljenik publike pazljivo je uz pomoc medija gradio taj imidz u kojem je predstavljen kako neki svetac iznad igre, sjecam se samo koliko su lobotomizirali mase o nejgovoj nepobjedivosti sva sreca pa se pojavio Nadal i raskrinkao te zablude a kasnije Djokovic ih samo potvrdio. Naravno da je Svicarski licemjer proteziran to je neosporno ali ne vrijedi se oko toga buniti jer se nece nista promjeniti, ljudima koji o tome odlucuju je u interesu da Federer ima takav status iako nemaju pokrice za to u rezultatima.

[babino]

o cemu oni raspravljaju, isto kao da neko dodje i buni se zasto je ronnie o'sullivan svaku noc na eurosportu

[bombaysaphire]

toliko favorizovanje jednog tenisera nikada nije u redu. pa i nole i rafa su vrhunski pa ni izdaleka nemaju takav tretman. pogotovo nole. pa njemu se namjerno otezava sa terminima itd. kada neko sam bira podloge, termine, da li ce se igrati sa ili bez krova itd... to je onda ogromna prednost nad ostalim igracima i to nikako nije fer. nole je rekao korektno ali je istovremeno uvjek osudjivan u medijim i nazivan svakako kada bi on ili neko mu blizak rekao da on zasluzuje bolji tretman. koji je nasprem rogerovog kao da se radi o pocetniku. a tolika razlika izmedju njih nije.razlika je do medijskog napuhavanja jednog. u igri nikako.

i jedno je najveci a drugo je najbolji. to smo vec diskutovali. nole je najbolji jer je igrao i igra najbolji tenis a rodja najveci jer je najtrofejniji.

To jeste tema za debatu jer na neki način on zaslužuje specijalan tretman jer je šestostruki šampion Australijan Opena i verovatno najbolji teniser u istoriji. Ako ga on nema, ko će ga imati? Ljudi žele da vide njega na centralnom terenu, u udarnom terminu, a to je u 19.30 na ‚Rod Lejver areni‘“, naglasio je Đoković.


Pozdrav.