Real Madrid CF (oficijelna tema)

[topnik1]

Navas se oprostio od kluba i bit ce zadnje pojacanje reala za ovu sezonu. Nista od marca

ma to klub prosipa politiku dovest ce real jos 2 ili 3 igraca,,samo sto mozda nece biti zvucna imena kao james,,kroos,,,

[madridist]

Ma ne, Realu ide a adidasu samo neki simboličan dio.

Jel te ovaj transfer stopera opio ili nas sam trollaš .
Prodaja dresova je važna stavka u budžetu svakog kluba i nema veze sa reklamom na dresu ili opremom koju igrači nose.Adidas plaća Madridu da nosi njegovu opremu a ne yebena prava na prodaju dresova Madrida.

Pa naravno, sasvim je logicno da adidas daje lupam 50 miliona eura godisnje realu za sponzorstvo i onda u svojim fabrikama od svojih troskova naprave dres i distribuiraju ga u cijelom svijetu i prodaju ga u svojim shopovima i zaradu od prodaje daju Realu huamana neka kompanija ne gledaju profit

Prodaja dresova nema veze sa reklamom na dresu,šta tu nije jasno?
Klub potpisuje sponzorski ugovor za reklamu na dresu neovisno o tome ko proizvodi dres.
Adidas plaća Madridu zato što je to reklama a ne zato da bi monopolizovao pravo na dresove Real Madrida,nemam egzaktne podatke ali nema teorije da Madrid nema golemi udio u tom kolaču od prodaje dresova.

[LvG]

Nemaš ti pojma, a ne egzaktne podatke.

[BigBigBang]

Hahahahaha cuj reklama na dresu od prodaje dresova dominantnu zaradu ima adidas ostalu sicu podjele igrac i klub ovisno o tome kako su se dogovorili. Ej reklama na dresu on racuna sponzorstvo adidasa, pa sto bi onda placali toliko novca ako je samo reklama na dresu zar im nije isplativije da puste nekom drugom proizvodjacu da proizvodi dresove i prodaje ih i daje svu zaradu od prodaje Realu a da adidas za manje para zakupi ono mjesto na dresu gdje je Fly Emirates ako je to samo reklama ko sto ti kazes Isplati im se u vise nacina, jeftinije je kupiti reklamu naprijed, veci logo bolje se vidi a jos ne mroaju proizvoditi i distribuirati dresove sirom svijeta


Pa jedan od glavnih razlgoa proizvodjaca opreme koji daju toliko novca klubovima je taj da prodaju dresove i ostale rekvizite sa logom kluba kojeg sponzorisu.

[Raul_64]

Adidas dobiva sigurno nekih 80-85%.
Ne sve , jer klubovi imaju neki profit.

To je bio fazon ovog monstroznog Unitedovog ugovora
gdje 100% zarade od prodaje dresova zadrzava adidas.

Dobit ce i Real od prodaje solidan dio , barem za njegovu platu da se razumijemo.
Al 30+ mil. koji placa adidas je glavni izvor ipak.

[madridist]

A 15-20 % od 1,4 miliona dresova godišnje je sića zar ne plus tih 30 i kusur miliona godišnje.

[rio_Ferdy88]

Opet Raul o Unitedu, drži se ti Reala

[Raul_64]

Opet Raul o Unitedu, drži se ti Reala

Stalkujes me

[kad_kako]

Izgleda da je pao dogovor sa PSG u vezi DiMaria-e...

[Dzoni]

Ovdje se opet brine o parama Real Madrida.
Koliko su neki ljudi glupi to je da ne povjerujes.

[tyler durden]

Spanish press are reporting that Real Madrid sold 50,000 James Rodriguez shirts yesterda

[suhi]

Mi mozemo samo nagadjati koliko ko dobije,proda,zaradi i sl. . Ono sto je sigurno je da real ostvaruje plus svake godine neovisno o tome koliko potrosi i racunica uvijek postoji. A ovi sto ne mogu da trose ili sto igraci nece da idu kod njih mogu da pate i dalje,ocekujemo i dogodine neki transfer od 100M

[barca_87]

A 15-20 % od 1,4 miliona dresova godišnje je sića zar ne plus tih 30 i kusur miliona godišnje.

pa zar nije 100 % realovo od dresova, otkud sad 15 %

sto volim ovako kad se neko pravi pametan pa na kraju ko pokiso kad skonta koliko je ofulo

[topnik1]

Izgleda da je pao dogovor sa PSG u vezi DiMaria-e...

[GameFKS]

A 15-20 % od 1,4 miliona dresova godišnje je sića zar ne plus tih 30 i kusur miliona godišnje.

pa zar nije 100 % realovo od dresova, otkud sad 15 %

sto volim ovako kad se neko pravi pametan pa na kraju ko pokiso kad skonta koliko je ofulo

Dobro ba jesi naporan u **** krasni jedan napiše drugačije ti opra, lijepo ti je napisao 15-20% i opet se ostvari profit . I nadoknadi se prodajom dresova više od pola transfera u nekim slučajevima i cijeli. Jako dobra marketinška stvar !

[madridist]

A gdje sam ja to napisao da Madrid uzima 100% zaradu od dresova?

[schweinsteiger]

Evo,da se ne svadjate


Ovo Merhwertsteuer je pdv i zbog njega cijena dresova u drzavama moze varirati,u Njemackoj je 19%.
Ne znam gdje neko pokupi info da je cijena 100€,toliko nikako ne moze biti.

Gebuhern an DFB je dio novca koji ide FS Njemacke,u ovom slucaju dio koji ide Realu.
I da je taj dio u ovom slucaju duplo veci,to bi izaslo na 10€.
Valjda prestanete pricati kako tako otplacujete igrace

Sto je najgore,svi se za to hvatate,mooozda imate neki original dres star koji godinu

[Saurman]

James Rodriguez Signing Latest Example of Real Madrid's Wasteful Spending

They've done it again. Colombian superstar James Rodriguez has officially moved from AS Monaco to Real Madrid, and as reported by SportsCenter, the youngster's $108 million price tag puts him among the top five most expensive players of all time, a list dominated by Los Blancos.

Now, it's important I preface this article by saying I'm a big fan of Rodriguez. I love this transfer from a tactical perspective, and I've been saying he was ready for the spotlight from the moment I first saw him play for FC Porto.

The 23-year-old is the complete package, combining phenomenal vision with great technique and the athletic ability to dominate. Rodriguez is already close to world-class level, and he's just scratching the surface of his potential.

That said, this transfer isn't right. In the age of supposed Financial Fair Play, Real Madrid simply shouldn't be allowed to spend such an enormous transfer fee on a single player.

Last year, Spanish economist Jose Maria Gay de Liebana calculated Los Blancos' debt for AS, and his conclusion was very bleak.

Real Madrid effectively have a debt of 541 million euros, which represents 64% of its total liabilities. That's a pretty large debt.

And the club has a problem, which is their level of short term debt, currently at 338 million euros, which is greater than their current or floating assets, which total 239 million euros. So that's a negative working balance of 100 million euros.

It's true that Madrid have a large cash flow, 156 million euros at the end of last season. That's all liquid assets. I presume that it has increased since 30 June with the sale of players, but they should not abuse their balance. If you look at Arsenal or Bayern Munich, the two reference points in terms of financial management, they have positive working balances.

Now, this was last season. It's common knowledge Real are riddled with debt, but it is unclear exactly how much debt the club currently carries. What we do know is that the team's debt has been steadily rising for the past decade, and the excessive spending indicates that trend isn't changing anytime soon.

Real Madrid are owned by its members, and Gay de Liebana believes that could soon change if the club doesn't change its financial policy :

No, the fact that Madrid are already have a substantial debt yet have big plans for their stadium could lead to them ending up to their eyeballs in debt, to the point where they would have to be converted into a PLC and start to provide capital. It then remains to be seen whether Real Madrid members are willing or able to provide money, and if not, then a benefactor will have to.

This is no trivial matter, but on some level, you can't knock Florentino Perez for continuing on this path.

UEFA's Financial Fair Play system is yet to intervene, and Spain's top clubs are helped by unfair tax breaks (per The Independent's Sam Wallace) and a monopoly on TV rights the Spanish government is just now trying to break (via Bloomberg's Alex Duff).

Real Madrid and Barcelona have been taking advantage of a system that is broken for a very long time, and as both teams don't realistically have to fear the repercussions, you can't really blame them for doing so.

But the system is (slowly) changing, and it appears Spain's top clubs are failing to account for that. UEFA is trying to push FFP, and Spain is looking into the laws that govern La Liga's TV rights.

The golden age of reckless spending was always going to end, and it's something that Spain's top clubs have to start preparing for. Forget about Real's plans to upgrade the Bernabeu, Los Blancos need to focus on their debts first and foremost.

Real are the most valuable sports team in the world, according to Forbes, and their revenue is massive. But it's not big enough to counter the debt,and the excessive spending will only add to the issue.

Real can buy Rodriguez, and that's the issue. It's not their fault the system is flawed, and no one should judge them for taking advantage of it. But people are changing the system, and Los Blancos are refusing to follow suit.

Sooner or later Real will be left with their mountain of debt and a system that is no longer geared toward giving them an unfair advantage. When that time comes, changes will have to be made. The transfer of Rodriguez shows Perez is not yet willing to face that reality.

[Dzoni]

[barca_87]

A 15-20 % od 1,4 miliona dresova godišnje je sića zar ne plus tih 30 i kusur miliona godišnje.

pa zar nije 100 % realovo od dresova, otkud sad 15 %

sto volim ovako kad se neko pravi pametan pa na kraju ko pokiso kad skonta koliko je ofulo

Dobro ba jesi naporan u **** krasni jedan napiše drugačije ti opra, lijepo ti je napisao 15-20% i opet se ostvari profit . I nadoknadi se prodajom dresova više od pola transfera u nekim slučajevima i cijeli. Jako dobra marketinška stvar !

otplati se pola transfera ??
real je prodao npr .2012.godine blizu 1,4 miliona dresova i znas koliko je te godine zarada bila 12 miliona eura cisto od prodaje svi mogucih dresova ,
i otplati ti pola transfera jamesa od njegovih dresova al u q

zato te bombe od otplacivanja transfera prodajom dresova bacajte negdje drugo