SportSport.ba

gio10 je napisao/la: A kome žene nisu opsesija ?

MaGiCa je napisao/la:

gio10 je napisao/la: A kome žene nisu opsesija ?

Na primer: Kacavendi

ElLoco7 je napisao/la:Predsjednik Sassuola je vec poceo **** Juve. Prvo je izjavio da Berardi nece sigurno u junu u Juve a sada vec podize cijenu sve vise i vise.

JTS je napisao/la:je l' istina da su Berardija primjetili dok je igrao fudbal s jaranima? pročitao sam negdje, pa et', ako neko zna, da mi odgovori

ElLoco7 je napisao/la:Berardi je u suvlasnistvu a ocito cete morat istrest finu svotu za drugu polovicu ugovora.

Co-ownership is common in Italian football.[1] They are regulated by Article 102 bis of FIGC Internal Organizational Regulations (Norme Organizzative Interne della FIGC) and are officially known as rights of participation (diritti di partecipazione).[2] For a co-ownership to be set, a player must have at least two years left in his current contract. The co-ownership deal itself will last one season — though it may be terminated early — after which the two clubs shall decide whether to renew or to terminate the deal. Should they fail to reach an agreement, the issue shall be resolved via a blind auction. In case none of the clubs submit a bid, the rights to the footballer shall remain to the club who had the actual use of the player during the season.[2]
When a player is in co-ownership between two teams, he can still be sent on a free loan to a third side, provided that both the owning clubs agree on the move. The club which the footballer is not currently playing for is allowed to sell its half share to another club, provided that the other owning club and the player agree.[2]
An example of co-ownership in practice was when the Brazilian player Adriano was co-owned by Inter and Parma.[3] Inter sold a half share in Adriano to Parma for £4M, who had the use of the player and had to pay his wages. If there had been a dispute over the rightful ownership of the player, it would have been settled by sealed bidding. Adriano had great success at Parma, which meant that Inter later paid £13.5M to buy out Parma's half share.[3]

L'Avvocato je napisao/la:

JTS je napisao/la:je l' istina da su Berardija primjetili dok je igrao fudbal s jaranima? pročitao sam negdje, pa et', ako neko zna, da mi odgovori

jeste ... igrali 5 na 5 u kampusu univerziteta, brat ga njegov zvao da igra s njim u ekipi, i tako ga primjete neki skauti

Brajkula je napisao/la:A da se informišete kako se rešavaju co-ownership odnosi u Italiji ? Stvarno bi mogli...

Co-ownership is common in Italian football.[1] They are regulated by Article 102 bis of FIGC Internal Organizational Regulations (Norme Organizzative Interne della FIGC) and are officially known as rights of participation (diritti di partecipazione).[2] For a co-ownership to be set, a player must have at least two years left in his current contract. The co-ownership deal itself will last one season — though it may be terminated early — after which the two clubs shall decide whether to renew or to terminate the deal. Should they fail to reach an agreement, the issue shall be resolved via a blind auction. In case none of the clubs submit a bid, the rights to the footballer shall remain to the club who had the actual use of the player during the season.[2]
When a player is in co-ownership between two teams, he can still be sent on a free loan to a third side, provided that both the owning clubs agree on the move. The club which the footballer is not currently playing for is allowed to sell its half share to another club, provided that the other owning club and the player agree.[2]
An example of co-ownership in practice was when the Brazilian player Adriano was co-owned by Inter and Parma.[3] Inter sold a half share in Adriano to Parma for £4M, who had the use of the player and had to pay his wages. If there had been a dispute over the rightful ownership of the player, it would have been settled by sealed bidding. Adriano had great success at Parma, which meant that Inter later paid £13.5M to buy out Parma's half share.[3]

poenta je boldovana, dakle, ukoliko se ranije ne dogovore dve strane, nakon dve godine ide slepa aukcija ko više ponudi.

ElLoco7 je napisao/la:a sta sam ja pogresno napisao? Sassuolo sad moze trazit koliko god hoce za drugu polovicu ugovora. njihov predsjednik je vec poceo sa igricama. mada vjerujem da ce ta cifra biti oko 10tak mil.

JTS je napisao/la:
ludilo, svaka mu čast samo da se ne vrati u Juve, da ne bi propao kao Giovinco tj. još uvijek ne, neka ga u Sassuolu, ili ako oni ispadnu, dati ga na posudbu u neki drugi klub Serie A bolje da igra redovno i da se razvija, nego da misli da l' će ući sa klupe u Juveu

IlCapitano je napisao/la:

ElLoco7 je napisao/la:a sta sam ja pogresno napisao? Sassuolo sad moze trazit koliko god hoce za drugu polovicu ugovora. njihov predsjednik je vec poceo sa igricama. mada vjerujem da ce ta cifra biti oko 10tak mil.

Pa ne može tražiti koliko hoće jer je to Juventusov igrač, dakle on mora ponuditi veću svotu od Juventusa ako hoće njega da zadrži, a slažemo li se da je ravno naučnoj fantastici da jedan Sassuolo ponudi više od 10 miliona?

On može da laprda koliko hoće, svakako će se dogovoriti sa Marottom prije toga i tu samo Juventus može diktirati uslove...

IlPrincipe je napisao/la:Borriello je mogao da bude jedan od najboljih napadača Serie A ikada da nije bilo žena, žene su njegova opsesija - Coriere Dello Sport 2011. godina..