SportSport.ba

arminz je napisao/la:Procijenili su da gradu ne trebaju dva ovakva kompleksa a i zajednickim snaga se moze vise postic. Ja sam ok da nastavimo dijelit stadion, sta nam je falilo do sad?

AC Milan and FC Inter Milan, during the presentation of the two proposals (Populous, Manica-Progetto CMR), made an intro by saying that the restructuring of Meazza would cause the suspension of the matches for 4 years. This means that the clubs, in the meantime, had to play in Turin, Bergamo or Verona. Along with creating long-term issues with the fans. Furthermore, a renovation would have changed the overall aspect (no more the same "iconicity" that it now has). During the renovation phase: the reduction in the stadium capacity would entail a huge loss in revenues for both clubs, with an overall estimate of 115 million euros. At the end of the renovation: the capacity would not be higher than 58,000 seats, with only 6,500 premium seats, limiting revenues as compared to a brand new stadium, according to the their study. These are the reasons why they want to build a new stadium in the nearby area and then demolish the Meazza.

Lastly, Conte revealed that Lukaku did not make the trip with the team due to an injury: “Romelu didn’t travel with us because he’s got a slight problem with his quadriceps. It’s a problem he’s had for about ten days now and one that he kept on mentioning, but tests have revealed that it’s nothing serious. We’re quite relaxed about it but didn’t want to risk him.”

Of the 48 councillors, 20 voted ‘no’ to a new stadium, 7 declared themselves ‘not favourable’, 19 are ‘undecided and open to dialogue’. Only two voted ‘yes’ to the new stadium

SiamoNoi je napisao/la:

Of the 48 councillors, 20 voted ‘no’ to a new stadium, 7 declared themselves ‘not favourable’, 19 are ‘undecided and open to dialogue’. Only two voted ‘yes’ to the new stadium