Moderatori/ce: Monolog,Unofficialpage
evo ti jos veceg cuda!!!bodi123 je napisao/la: ↑20 avg 2024, 22:32https://www.itia.tennis/news/sanctions/ ... ping-case/
Vidi čuda, evo još jednog talijana koji je imao identičan problem sa clostebolom ko Sinner a nije poznat i nije prvi na svijetu, a oslobođen optužbi i također prošao bez ikakve suspenzije.
Ali hajde, lakše je zapaliti cigaru i smišljati teorije zavjere, kako je onaj ili ovaj suspendovan a Jannik nije, gdje je tu jednaka pravda prema svima
2. slučaj(banovani)On 5 February 2024, Bortolotti accepted that clostebol was present in their sample, and therefore admitted to the ADRVs, but provided an explanation. The player asserted that they did not intend to cheat and did not knowingly ingest clostebol, providing evidence of involuntary contamination. As part of the investigation, the ITIA sought scientific advice from the WADA-accredited laboratory in Montreal, Canada, where the sample was analysed, for expert views on the plausibility of the player’s explanation.
The laboratory performed calculations based on Bortolotti’s exposure to the clostebol and the concentration detected in their sample and confirmed, based on scientific literature, that the player’s explanation was credible.
The independent tribunal determined that Battaglino did not prove the **** of the clostebol and therefore found that the anti-doping rule violations were intentional.
Vragolasti tenis objasnio sve u srž.Bio kriv ili ne, bio svjestan unosa steroida ili ne, u periodu od 5 mjeseci koliko je čitav proces trajao Jannik Sinner nedvojbeno NIJE SMIO IGRATI TENIS. I to je u cijeloj priči najviše zabrinjavajuće. Kako je moguće da igrač pod istragom, koja je usput prikrivena, slobodno nastupa na Touru? Po svemu što smo vidjeli dosad, to je apsolutno nečuveno.
I recimo da je službeno priopćenje točno, da je količina nedozvoljene supstance smiješna i da Sinner nije imao pojma da mu je fizio preko kreme i rane na prstu to prenio, recimo da je sve to točno. U tom slučaju se od trenutka presude Jannik vraća na teren, nema problema, ali od pozitivnog testa do presude MORAO JE BITI SUSPENDIRAN.
Al se svi pravimo naivni. Pa ako hoće da ga puste, a hoće, naravno da ce napisati da je vjerodostojan i da je dokazao. I nole je imao valjanu vizu i izuzece pa je protjeran jer su tako htjeli. Koje gluposti citat za nepovjerovati.bodi123 je napisao/la: ↑20 avg 2024, 23:01
Kralju razlika je u tome što je ovaj prvi uspio dokazati lokaciju i vrijeme incidenta, kao što je i Sinner i zbog toga su oslobođeni, a taj što je banovan nije ništa dokazao bez obzira čime se branio.
Toliko teško za shvatiti?
1. slučaj(oslobođeni:
2. slučaj(banovani)On 5 February 2024, Bortolotti accepted that clostebol was present in their sample, and therefore admitted to the ADRVs, but provided an explanation. The player asserted that they did not intend to cheat and did not knowingly ingest clostebol, providing evidence of involuntary contamination. As part of the investigation, the ITIA sought scientific advice from the WADA-accredited laboratory in Montreal, Canada, where the sample was analysed, for expert views on the plausibility of the player’s explanation.
The laboratory performed calculations based on Bortolotti’s exposure to the clostebol and the concentration detected in their sample and confirmed, based on scientific literature, that the player’s explanation was credible.
The independent tribunal determined that Battaglino did not prove the **** of the clostebol and therefore found that the anti-doping rule violations were intentional.
Ali evo da se na kraju dokaze da se nije dopingovao i da jest sve tacno sto je rekao i da je zvanicna presuda da nije uzimao dope, ko ce mu nadoknaditi tu "nepravednu" suspenziju. Nije kriv dok se ne dokaze suprotno, stoga mislim da je okej sto je nastavio igrati.CAGarfia je napisao/la: ↑20 avg 2024, 23:42Vragolasti tenis objasnio sve u srž.Bio kriv ili ne, bio svjestan unosa steroida ili ne, u periodu od 5 mjeseci koliko je čitav proces trajao Jannik Sinner nedvojbeno NIJE SMIO IGRATI TENIS. I to je u cijeloj priči najviše zabrinjavajuće. Kako je moguće da igrač pod istragom, koja je usput prikrivena, slobodno nastupa na Touru? Po svemu što smo vidjeli dosad, to je apsolutno nečuveno.
I recimo da je službeno priopćenje točno, da je količina nedozvoljene supstance smiješna i da Sinner nije imao pojma da mu je fizio preko kreme i rane na prstu to prenio, recimo da je sve to točno. U tom slučaju se od trenutka presude Jannik vraća na teren, nema problema, ali od pozitivnog testa do presude MORAO JE BITI SUSPENDIRAN.
Ma zaštićeni su ovi najjači ko polarni medvjedi. Džumhur bi fasovao kaznu i još bi se cijela naša javnost smijala da mu je priča ovo sa fizioterapeutom i kremom, nebitno tačna ili ne bila.
Given Sinner’s profile in the world of tennis and the allegations of double standards, Ubitennis spoke with somebody with a solid understanding of tennis’ anti-doping process. Richard Ings was head of the ATP’s Anti-Doping Program from 2001 to 2005 before becoming the CEO of the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority from 2005 to 2010.
One of the biggest questions raised is why did it take so long to publically confirm the provisional suspensions?
“I read the decision and the rules were followed to the letter. Sinner was provisionally suspended. His lawyers lodged a same-day appeal for urgent lifting of the provisional suspension based on evidence he had no fault. An expedited hearing in such cases is a feature of the rules.” Ings explains.
“An arbitrator heard the appeal and handed down his decision to lift the suspension. No announcement can be made under the rules now until the matter is heard in full by a tribunal. So he can play.
“The tribunal reviewed the full case of evidence and found Sinner had no fault. So no suspension was imposed. But he automatically loses points and prize money at the first even he tested positive at. That is mandatory even if you are found to have absolutely no fault for the positive so the rules were perfectly followed.”
Ings point out that this matter took place outside of the ATP’s jurisdiction and therefore they had no play in the process.
“This matter has nothing to do with the ATP. The ITIA takes the sample and prosecutes the case. Sports Resolution convenes the training and arbitrators. The ATP is not involved by design. Nor is the ITF.” He said.
“It’s normally quite tough for a player to find the **** (that causes a positive result) but in this case, it was obvious and supportable. He had a compelling case for no fault. But it’s still cost him half a million plus all this negative press and locker room barbs.” Ings added.
There are also concerns about misinformation. For example, on social media, there are claims that Trofodermin isn’t used to treat cuts which which is incorrect.
There are questions about Sinner’s former physio and if any action should be taken against him. If the tennis star had brought Trofodermin and used it himself, he would likely be found at fault and given some form of ban based on previous cases of other athletes doing the same.
“I’d be asking the player what becomes of the trainer. The trainer’s actions cost Sinner over half a million dollars, including lawyers,” Ings commented.
As for the wider picture, he acknowledges lower ranked players on the Tour would face more challenges if they was to be in a similar situation.
“The key observation here is ****. Sinner clearly has the **** to get the best lawyers to draft a same-day request for an expedited hearing. A less well-**** player would struggle to do that.” He concluded.
Sinner has not spoken to reporters about his case so far but has issued a statement. However, he will face questions this weekend at the US Open when he takes part in the pre-tournament media day.
Trenutno korisnika/ca: Nema prijavljenih korisnika/ca. i 1 gost.
